From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Gouders Subject: Re: [Bug #37472] Lenovo U160 (i915 black screen) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:14:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de; s=et; t=1309158859; bh=Gb3pTTkKaSlI45Qy0PYhGJH4rLM/wVe0lY3cydMCsRw=; h=From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=nMJulutmnc8sHcLiu1k4J0TdrgIopPkUTa7XYUwRnvUyPrGyiLEN99m2HHRoyelLD ydUNzaxaLhhTFSFDugECbGqXlSdHkoy4BwHTGcP1l7XbF9QfT0CBv47GUOQmSmjL6W O0tsbe1xXpkiA//n6IQtSIQgjxHJlFkCaNHgh6PI= In-Reply-To: (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:35:14 +0200 (CEST)") Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Robse > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37472 > Subject : Lenovo U160 (i915 black screen) > Submitter : Robse > Date : 2011-06-14 15:17 (13 days old) This sounds like a problem, I was discussing with Jesse Barnes, some days ago[1]. For me, the usage of the kernel parameter 'i915.lvds_use_ssc=0' serves as a useful workaround. Perhaps, Robse will try that option and document it in the Bug-Entry if it also works for him. Dirk [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/31/387