Re: [Bug #15096] Resume lock up -- bisected, commit 3a1151e3f124fd1a2c54b8153f510f1a7c715369

Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-08T19:24:32Z

On Monday 08 February 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> W dniu 8 lutego 2010 11:56 użytkownik Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> napisał:
> > On Monday 08 February 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> 2010/2/8 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15096
> >> > Subject : Resume lock up -- bisected, commit 3a1151e3f124fd1a2c54b8153f510f1a7c715369
> >> > Submitter : Rafał Miłecki <zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> > Date : 2010-01-20 23:15 (19 days old)
> >> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/3a1151e3f124fd1a2c54b8153f510f1a7c715369
> >
> > It looks like we should revert this commit, seems broken.
> >
> > Anyway, I'll do my best to have a look at this bug later today.
>
> In such case I'd prefer to add "broken_DOS" flag for devices that were
> enabled by this patch. We could avoid restoring backlight on resume
> for broken_DOS then and maybe just update brightness to current value.

Or perhaps we can try to restore the backlight at a different place.

Rafael