From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:19:11 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4un6Gst5rKB.A.Im.WkIeLB@chimera> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4un6Gst5rKB.A.Im.WkIeLB@chimera> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Mon\, 15 Feb 2010 00\:38\:29 +0100 \(CET\)") Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Christian Casteyde , Linus Torvalds , Tejun Heo , Greg Kroah-Hartman "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999 > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend > Submitter : Christian Casteyde > Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old) I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives. http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329 It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise it seems to be working well. Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34. Eric