From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:08:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <96DQe4a_2tH.A.4RE.497GNB@chimera> <201012301545.15667.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201012301545.15667.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:45:15 +0100") Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Ben Hutchings "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: >> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and >> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing >> incoming mail queue :-( > > Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed. s/is/isn't/ I assume. I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any regression here, AFAIK at least. -- Krzysztof Halasa