Re: [Bug #14354] Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards

tytso-3s7WtUTddSA
2009-11-18T00:11:42Z

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:23:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> I wasn't quite sure what the status was, because there was some
> activity in the bug entry after it had been marked as resolved.

Yeah, the actual regression had been resolved (by changing the
default), but the root cause was due to the fact that not enough
people had done proper power-fail testing for the journal_checksum,
even though the code had been in the kernel for a very long time. The
discussion afterwards was focused around fixing those problems so we
could make journal_checksum be the default at some point in the future.

- Ted