From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Packard Subject: Re: [Bug #37472] Lenovo U160 (i915 black screen) Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:46:40 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Pekka Enberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Robse , Chris Wilson --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:56:19 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > There's no mention that the i915 developers know about this problem so > I'm CC'ing Keith and Chris. Thanks. I've added a comment to the bug: First off, of course you are encouraged to re-test with 3.0-rc6 just to make sure it hasn't changed in some way. I don't think anything has changed enough to affect this, but it's always good to be sure. I note a long sequence of patches that are supposed to help with the U160: 448f53a1ede54eb854d036abf54573281412d650 drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 10= 0/120 Mhz SSC clocks bcfbbce822d219eb587acaba8a6e062bbeae4761 Revert "drm/i915/bios: Reverse ord= er of 100/120 Mhz SSC clocks" a76150302d6e7ebc43e1a1ddaee7fd51db8da3b3 drm/i915: Add a module option to o= verride the use of SSC I'm not sure why a quirk wasn't added for this hardware; it's clearly 'non-standard' in some mystic way. =2D-=20 keith.packard-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOGg+wQp8BWwlsTdMRAlJ9AJ0aysob1rpLhcgLgHLmaSPOpKbTPQCdE9sg wS4P4BsoGtzL9Vj1SuYP2lA= =UXgp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--