From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D53CC8830 for ; Wed, 17 May 2023 07:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 76E4968C4E; Wed, 17 May 2023 09:54:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 09:54:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Sagi Grimberg , Jakub Kicinski , Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Chuck Lever , kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev, Boris Pismenny Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] net/tls: implement ->read_sock() Message-ID: <20230517075444.GA30685@lst.de> References: <20230419065714.52076-1-hare@suse.de> <20230419065714.52076-7-hare@suse.de> <20230509174724.4a198306@kernel.org> <0097e7c0-351a-b922-dd77-ab414b53170b@grimberg.me> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:53:10AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Problem is the MSG_SPLIC patchset from David Howells; that essentially does > away with ->sendpage(). > So I'm not sure how to go from here; wait for the patchset to land, and > rebase my patches on top of that, or proactively switch away from > ->sendpage() and resubmit directly. I'd wait for it. It should make life a lot simpler.