From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Steve Sears <sjs@hammerspace.com>,
Thomas Haynes <loghyr@hammerspace.com>,
kernel-tls-handshake <kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Subject: Re: RPC-with-TLS client does not receive traffic
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 16:01:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250519160102.26d95e57@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48aaf181-b7cf-45d1-ba60-bf90ad45d842@oracle.com>
On Sat, 17 May 2025 12:39:58 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote:
> > Hm, yes, my intuition would be to add a xs_poll_check_readable()
> > after connection set up to check if we raced with data being queued?
> >
> > IIUC sk->sk_user_data is not set up when the first event fires
> > so xs_data_ready() ignores it? We can't set user_data sooner?
>
> I think the answer to this is that sunrpc never sees a data ready event.
> The value contained in sk->sk_user_data is therefore irrelevant.
>
> Because tls_setsockopt() sets strp->msg_ready, when the underlying
> socket event arrives tls_data_ready() is a no-op. That terminates the
> ->data_ready call chain before xs_data_ready can be called.
>
> The handshake daemon sets the session key by calling tls_setsockopt.
> When it hangs:
>
> function: tls_setsockopt
> function: do_tls_setsockopt_conf
> function: tls_set_device_offload_rx
> function: tls_set_sw_offload
> function: init_prot_info
> function: tls_strp_init
> function: tls_sw_strparser_arm
> function: tls_strp_check_rcv
> function: tls_strp_read_sock
> function: tls_strp_load_anchor_with_queue
> function: tls_rx_msg_size
> function: tls_device_rx_resync_new_rec
> function: tls_rx_msg_ready <<<<<
>
> The next call to tls_data_ready sees strp->msg_ready is set, returns
> without doing anything, and progress stops.
>
> In the successful case, tls_strp_check_rcv() simply returns, leaving
> strp->msg_ready set to zero. The next call to tls_data_ready can
> then process the ingress data and call xs_data_ready.
Is there any data queued on the TLS socket already when it "hangs" ?
If it's getting into msg_ready state without the data - it's a bug
in TLS. If there's a full record queued at the time when handshake
passes the socket back to the kernel - it's up to the reader to read
the already queued data out.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-19 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0288b61b-6a8e-409d-8e4c-3f482526cf46@oracle.com>
2025-05-15 14:44 ` RPC-with-TLS client does not receive traffic Chuck Lever
2025-05-15 15:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-15 15:05 ` Chuck Lever
2025-05-16 23:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
[not found] ` <8ABF3663-1BDD-4B87-8DA5-AB39774B1B89@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <20250516165355.6efb470e@kernel.org>
2025-05-17 16:39 ` Chuck Lever
2025-05-19 23:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250519160102.26d95e57@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=loghyr@hammerspace.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=sjs@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox