KernelCI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nikolai Kondrashov" <Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com>
To: kernelci@groups.io,
	"automated-testing@yoctoproject.org"
	<automated-testing@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: KCIDB engagement report #kcidb
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:54:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1948612a-b0cb-71d5-ca5c-5231ab6bcdb7@redhat.com> (raw)

Hi everyone,

Below is the monthly report on KCIDB* engagement. It lists various CI systems
and their status of engagement with KCIDB, and once we get to that, will list
developer engagement.

Lines with updates are marked with "!".

The main news is that ARM are now sending their production data!

     KernelCI native
         Sending staging results.
         Transitioning to production results is at 50%
         (KCIDB support done, backend work started).
         https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/?var-origin=kernelci

     Red Hat CKI
         Sending production results.
         https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/?var-origin=redhat

     Google Syzbot
         Sending a subset of production results (failures only).
         https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/?var-origin=syzbot

     ARM
!       Sending production results to "production" KCIDB.
!       Full commit hashes are currently not available, are spoofed, and don't
!       match the ones reported by others. To be fixed soon.
!       https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/?var-origin=arm

     Sony Fuego
         Internal design in progress.

     Gentoo GKernelCI
         Prototype work has started.
         Gentoo is in a CI system transition, and progress is slow.

     Intel 0day
         Initial conversation concluded, general interest expressed,
         no contact since.

     Google OSS-Fuzz
!       Not really suited for kernel testing, although QEMU virtual device
!       fuzzing they run could be used as a kernel test.
!       Dropping Google OSS-Fuzz in the next report.

     Linaro LKFT
         Participated in KCIDB kick-off, no contact regarding reporting since.

Please respond with corrections or suggestions of other CI systems to contact.

Nick

*KCIDB is an effort to unify Linux Kernel CI reporting, maintained by Linux
  Foundation's KernelCI project:
  https://foundation.kernelci.org/blog/2020/08/21/introducing-common-reporting/


             reply	other threads:[~2020-12-17  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17  9:54 Nikolai Kondrashov [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-21 10:07 KCIDB engagement report #kcidb Nikolai Kondrashov
2021-01-21 10:17 ` Mathieu Acher
2021-01-21 10:26   ` Nikolai Kondrashov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1948612a-b0cb-71d5-ca5c-5231ab6bcdb7@redhat.com \
    --to=nikolai.kondrashov@redhat.com \
    --cc=automated-testing@yoctoproject.org \
    --cc=kernelci@groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox