From: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
Cc: kernelci@groups.io
Subject: Re: Some suggestions and questions
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:19:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181213161950.GP10669@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181213152909.lqqzkao72bvgrf7s@xps.therub.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1588 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:29:09AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:34:57PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 07:14:34AM -0500, Mike Holmes wrote:
> > It'll get passed through but clients don't know to do anything with it,
> > you either get noise characters in the subject if people hashtag words
> > that are already there (which is a common way of doing these things),
> > it's less of an issue if they just get added to the end of the subject
> > line but still looks weird. It's like when people start randomly adding
> > @ to people's names in e-mail.
> I think we should try the hashtag - I'll make next week's meeting
> minutes thread with subject Meeting #Minutes for YYYY-MM-DD. Then, we'll
> end up with a linkable archive of meeting minutes at
> https://groups.io/g/kernelci/hashtags, which should obviate the need for
> opening up the shared google doc.
If we're going to do it could we do it with a #minutes at the end of the
subject instead so that it doesn't disrupt the actual subject?
Since people read more by pattern matching the shapes of text than by
parsing out the individual letters (particularly when reading at speed)
it's not great to have them in the middle of text, this works a lot
better in systems that support hashtags since they tend to provide
visual cues that this isn't a normal word and even there outside of
Twitter with its severe length restrictions they normally get pushed to
a separate bit after the real text (Instagram used to encourage people
to put them in comments, not even in the actual post).
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 21:38 Some suggestions and questions Dan Rue
2018-12-13 11:49 ` [kernelci] " Mark Brown
2018-12-13 12:14 ` Mike Holmes
2018-12-13 12:34 ` Mark Brown
2018-12-13 15:29 ` Dan Rue
2018-12-13 16:19 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2018-12-13 16:33 ` Dan Rue
2018-12-13 16:38 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <156FE20DF2374CC6.18828@groups.io>
2018-12-13 12:15 ` [kernelci] " Mark Brown
2018-12-14 18:00 ` Kevin Hilman
2018-12-14 18:06 ` Mark Brown
2018-12-14 21:51 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181213161950.GP10669@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.rue@linaro.org \
--cc=kernelci@groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox