From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:38:34 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: Branch for kernelci Message-ID: <20191016123833.GG49619@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <20191015202114.GA120152@google.com> <20191016095636.GA4881@sirena.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191016095636.GA4881@sirena.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline List-ID: To: Mark Brown Cc: kernelci@groups.io, tkjos@google.com, will@kernel.org On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:56:36AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 01:52:36PM -0700, Todd Kjos via Groups.Io wrote: > > Please add testing for Will Deacon's ARM64 staging tree to kernelci: > > > [web] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=for-kernelci > > [git] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci > > > It would make sense to have dashboard available as "arm64" or some > > other unique tree name (eg "https://kernelci.org/job/arm64"). > > > The owners of this tree are the ARM64 maintainers: will@kernel.org and > > catalin.marinas@arm.com (CC'd) > > Are you sure they are interested in this? When asked previously they > indicated that they didn't see any extra value in covering their tree > specifically separately to -next. Will can comment on the reasoning but I guess it came as a request from him since he also created the arm64/for-kernelci branch. This might as well be the same as for-next/core but tested in isolation rather than with the whole linux-next tree. -- Catalin