From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:22:42 +0100 From: "Cristian Marussi" Subject: Re: Contributing ARM tests results to KCIDB Message-ID: <20200917162242.GA18067@e119603-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200917125044.GA29636@e119603-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline List-ID: To: Nikolai Kondrashov Cc: kernelci@groups.io, broonie@kernel.org, basil.eljuse@arm.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:52:30PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 9/17/20 3:50 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > Hi Nikolai, > > > > I work at ARM in the Kernel team and, in short, we'd like certainly to > > contribute our internal Kernel test results to KCIDB. > > Wonderful! > > > After having attended your LPC2020 TestMC and KernelCI/BoF, I've now cooked > > up some KCIDB JSON test report (seemingly valid against your KCIDB v3 schema) > > and I'd like to start experimenting with kci-submit (on non-production > > instances), so as to assess how to fit our results into your schema and maybe > > contribute with some new KCIDB requirements if strictly needed. > > Great, this is exactly what we need, welcome aboard :) > > Please don't hesitate to reach out on kernelci@groups.io or on #kernelci on > freenode.net, if you have any questions, problems, or requirements. > > > Is it possible to get some valid credentials and a playground instance to > > point at ? > > Absolutely, I created credentials for you and sent them in a separate message. > > You can use origin "arm" for the start, unless you have multiple CI systems > and want to differentiate them somehow in your reports. > > Nick > Thanks ! It works too ... :D https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-dataset=playground_kernelci04&var-id=arm:2020-07-07:d3d7689c2cc9503266cac3bc777bb4ddae2e5f2e ..quick question though....given that now I'll have to play quite a bit with it and see how's better to present our data, if anythinjg missing etc etc, is there any chance (or way) that if I submmit the same JSON report multiple times with slight differences here and there (but with the same IDs clearly) I'll get my DB updated in the bits I have changed: as an example I've just resubmitted the same report with added discovery_time and descriptions, and got NO errors, but I cannot see the changes in the UI (unless they have still to propagate...)..or maybe I can obtain the same effect by dropping my dataset before re-submitting ? Regards Thanks Cristian > On 9/17/20 3:50 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > Hi Nikolai, > > > > I work at ARM in the Kernel team and, in short, we'd like certainly to > > contribute our internal Kernel test results to KCIDB. > > > > After having attended your LPC2020 TestMC and KernelCI/BoF, I've now cooked > > up some KCIDB JSON test report (seemingly valid against your KCIDB v3 schema) > > and I'd like to start experimenting with kci-submit (on non-production > > instances), so as to assess how to fit our results into your schema and maybe > > contribute with some new KCIDB requirements if strictly needed. > > > > Is it possible to get some valid credentials and a playground instance to > > point at ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Regards > > > > Cristian > > > > > > > > > > >