From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 11:41:17 -0800 From: Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Bump minimum supported version of LLVM to 11.0.0 Message-ID: <202112011140.DA93B3E@keescook> References: <20211129165803.470795-1-nathan@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211129165803.470795-1-nathan@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline List-ID: To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Masahiro Yamada , Miguel Ojeda , Sami Tolvanen , Tom Stellard , Michael Ellerman , Naresh Kamboju , Jakub Kicinski , cki-project@redhat.com, kernelci@groups.io, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:57:57AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > This patch series raises the minimum supported version of LLVM to > 11.0.0. > > Patch #1 outlines the issue, goes over the potential impact of the > change, and does the actual bump. Subsequent patches clean up the > various checks that are always true after the bump. > > I have marked this revision as RFC to give various parties the option to > comment on this bump before it is done, namely KernelCI and Linaro's > LKFT, who are still testing clang-10. I have added some other folks to > CC that I know are testing with clang to see if this impacts them in any > way (as I would like to impact as few people as possible) but as far as > I am aware, most other CIs and developers are testing closer to tip of > tree. If that is not true, scream so that we can see what can be done > about that. If I missed anyone who is actively testing with clang, > please key them in and I will make sure to include them in future > revisions (if any are needed). > > It probably makes sense for this series to live in -mm. Sounds good to me. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Kees Cook -- Kees Cook