* Re: [REGRESSION] stable-rc/linux-5.10.y: (build) in vmlinux (Makefile:1212) [logspec:kbuild,kbuild.other]
[not found] <CACo-S-0BKPQcA2Qh-7jmuU-YuX9E_wWcHEgr8pDhgwkzt0K5cQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2025-03-11 14:22 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2025-03-11 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelci; +Cc: kernelci-results, gus, stable
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:47:06PM +0000, KernelCI bot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> New build issue found on stable-rc/linux-5.10.y:
>
> ---
> in vmlinux (Makefile:1212) [logspec:kbuild,kbuild.other]
> ---
>
> - dashboard: https://d.kernelci.org/issue/maestro:d5c2be698989c7de46471109aae8df0339b713c1
> - giturl: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> - commit HEAD: a0e8dfa03993fda7b4d4b696c50f69726522abba
>
>
> Log excerpt:
> =====================================================
> .lds
> In file included from ./include/linux/kernel.h:15,
> net/ipv6/udp.c: In function ‘udp_v6_send_skb’:
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:20:35: warning: comparison of distinct
> pointer types lacks a cast
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:26:18: note: in expansion of macro ‘__typecheck’
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:36:31: note: in expansion of macro ‘__safe_cmp’
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:45:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘__careful_cmp’
> net/ipv6/udp.c:1213:28: note: in expansion of macro ‘min’
> In file included from ./include/linux/uaccess.h:7,
> net/ipv4/udp.c: In function ‘udp_send_skb’:
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:20:35: warning: comparison of distinct
> pointer types lacks a cast
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:26:18: note: in expansion of macro ‘__typecheck’
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:36:31: note: in expansion of macro ‘__safe_cmp’
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:45:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘__careful_cmp’
> net/ipv4/udp.c:926:28: note: in expansion of macro ‘min’
This warnings I can understand, we'll just have to live with that.
But:
> FAILED unresolved symbol filp_close
What is that from?
Seems to be from 890ed45bde80 ("acct: block access to kernel internal
filesystems")? If so, that's really odd as this is not a new call to
this function, but just some additional ones.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread