From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12DDF362154 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789481344; cv=none; b=PQkGhEs/e8kRfHStT0jC24KeNefLOry07/g0fj6xEllyhd3RGPMj82TjSQr7q1XXbS00+0DkEIGq7fz/+I7GEMIb5/x6mtRU+/J2q64xWJrzeyiug0I5eEMQIUuQxLCpYySsAD7lOXaQJPg+vd110z4Jfcb1amlDvJZVwqvW/uA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789481344; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+FYueeoLe7CB6r0ffmkucB90kJoCHiWq48g9dkvRcBA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SxeVq1dwjV+XMP1TJztiLcXyaDYqTF4JFh3eECjTGWWCnScSJjF71V3kN0I+iRqw1JlMCOTBo6HEZlFXO5OofZvEmzxRCMLgtj71UT0d8n1zEtkKR1ybr4wKqWC/8JQ6fdsOJo7jKGZAaNEd/86qJlu309uAHY3w8hFPdYxxQIY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=VIydSeuW; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=8o1tGgLi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="VIydSeuW"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="8o1tGgLi" Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:08:58 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1789481340; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+FYueeoLe7CB6r0ffmkucB90kJoCHiWq48g9dkvRcBA=; b=VIydSeuWgQlnkUxb6qaMr2jyK2nS27LSnMA/QMgXYH6l9vVSpAqUzc4ASKW0765aT0grBw iPJhwSbZrr1T5N8BOwLdgGM2z/KizrdEd6/1lkwSHq8p5n48JZ/GJsY2F5W6Nzm7Dpxiu6 S3Xqe8K3jbZI6HUAc06sgyRdtjiqWAfD/q5gtxAQHq0uA6NqBP6Y33luZTbx7AZbOzc5T+ Q/5NC2Rx2cx4gvBtPCEf75tiffyBFfSTEhJseNOLVeUS8NjQaSKRDlC6SDmXBruhWVR77d xVHVCK+B8kswyeeKOnwv1z9Hw3JL5N0IU9Mq/iIgzURNGMbh1ApAaCqgc8+dng== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1789481340; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+FYueeoLe7CB6r0ffmkucB90kJoCHiWq48g9dkvRcBA=; b=8o1tGgLirOfU83pyU0NP9Obeu7RjSnV+a+Sd3xOzUjKv3LkI5eHoECe7GzNGPV4NQlz/xZ oKLvCKAzo3H41+Bw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Alan Zanoni Peixinho Cc: kernelci@lists.linux.dev, kernelci-webdashboard@groups.io, John Ogness Subject: Re: kernelci test results Message-ID: <20260915140858.W5JzUKyx@linutronix.de> References: <20260903154354.rXZZL6F9@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kernelci@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: On 2026-09-03 15:37:09 [-0300], Alan Zanoni Peixinho wrote: > Hi Sebastian, I work with the dashboard team, so I hope I am able to help= you. Hi Alan, > First of all, thanks for using the dashboard, and for taking time to > write this up. Scenarios like this one are exactly what help us find > the UX gaps for improvement. >=20 > The dashboard is mostly organized around tree checkouts first. > If i understood it properly you might be able to achieve what you are > looking for via: > 1. Selecting a tree (ie stable-rt/v6.6-rt). > 2. Clicking on the filters button on the right. There we can apply > filters for configs (defconfig+preempt_rt, etc). > 3. We click on the tests tab (default tab is for builds). > 4. On the list of tests you can search for test paths (cyclictest, > rt-tests, etc). Oh, okay. This makes things a bit easier. Now that I clicked next tree and filter the preempt_rt builds I see "builds", "boots" and "tests". Now clicking below I can get all the cyclictest results for all the boards. The confusing part is that "boots" says 0 but then I can download the complete log for one of the boards where the test did run. So I guess "boot" is something else here. > Link for the view: > https://dashboard.kernelci.org/tree/stable-rt/v6.6-rt/84925bb144f49eb0d5f= 4c5c29f690b4bbf84903b?df|c|defconfig%2Bpreempt_rt=3Dtrue&p=3Dt >=20 > That list is for that checkout across hardware, so you do not have to > go board by board. (Unfortunately there is still no search for =E2=80=9Ct= his > test on this device over time=E2=80=9D across all trees.) I see. > About the other questions. >=20 > All the logs presented are the ones that have been submitted via KCI > submissions, so there might be some missing information when not > reported. Okay. What I see that the "kubernetes" seem not to submit anything but the actual tests do. > On the topic of notifying on log errors, this is a feature on active > discussion, to automate notification for first for boots and later for > test failures as well. Today we only notify registered issues. >=20 > We are actually looking for some feedback of dashboard users to help > us steer on the roadmap for new features, and your help would be much > appreciated. Is there something you want me to do? > Att > Alan Peixinho > KernelCI Dashboard Team Sebastian