Re: plumbers session on CI and LLVM

["Mathieu Acher" <mathieu.acher@irisa.fr>]

Hi, 

I will attend Plumbers and am interested by continuous integration and LLVM, great initiative. 

Best, 

--
Dr. Mathieu ACHER, Associate Professor
Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA, France (DiverSE team)
http://www.mathieuacher.com/

----- Mail original -----
> De: "khilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>
> À: "Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Cc: kernelci@groups.io, "Chen Rong" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>, "Philip Li" <philip.li@intel.com>, "Dan Rue"
> <dan.rue@linaro.org>, "clang-built-linux" <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>, "Mathieu Acher"
> <mathieu.acher@irisa.fr>, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>, "Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Juillet 2020 18:19:27
> Objet: Re: plumbers session on CI and LLVM

> Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:
> 
>> Hi Kevin and folks,
>> I'm trying to put together a Micro Conference for plumbers focused on
>> LLVM.  In particular, I'd like to have a session that focuses on
>> Continuous Integration (KernelCI, 0day bot, tuxbuild, kernel
>> configuration space, and LLVM buildbots).
>>
>> I'm curious, are you all planning on attending the conference?
> 
> Yes, I plan to attend and most KernelCI folks will be there as well as
> we'll have a few topics at the testing/fuzzing microconf.
> 
>> If so, would such a session be of interest to attend or speak at?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> I saw the testing MC has already been approved and that Kevin and
>> Sasha are the leads.  I'm still working on the approval for our MC so
>> it may not happen ultimately, but I still would like to have such a
>> session regardless of which MC it's in.
>>
>> Do folks who are planning to attend such a session have thoughts on
>> whether we can carve this out of the existing testing MC vs keep it in
>> the LLVM MC, or even if it is of value or not?
> 
> If you don't get your approved, feel free to submit to testing/fuzzing,
> but it looks to me that doing so would limit the scope of topics you
> want to discuss.  It sounds to me like you have enough non-CI topics for
> your own MC.
> 
>> One thing I'm curious is what happens for two concurrent MCs if leads
>> need to attend both?  Maybe the conference committee can help us avoid
>> such scheduling contention?
> 
> When you submit your MC you can request to be scheduled separately from
> testing/fuzzing so we can attend both.
> 
> Kevin