Re: [kernelci] debian rootfs for ramdisk and NFS

["Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>]

"Ana Guerrero Lopez" <ana.guerrero@collabora.com> writes:

> On 06/06/18 10:14, Matt Hart wrote:
>> On 6 June 2018 at 09:11, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/04/2018 10:33 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>> Hi Ana,
>>>>
>>>> In testing the debian rootfs images for NFS, Matt Hart and I both
>>>> noticed that the full.rootfs.tar.xz images don't work for NFS because
>>>> the systemd network init causes a (re)init of networking while actively
>>>> using an NFSroot.  This causes things to grind to a halt.
>>>>
>>>> So the first question is whether anyone knows if systemd can be made
>>>> pursuaded to not try to reconfigure networking.
>>>>
>>>> Ideally, we'd like a single rootfs image to be either a ramdisk, where
>>>> it might need to (re)configure networking and an NFSroot where it
>>>> definitely should not reconfigure networking.
>>>>
>>>> It would be a shame to have to have different images for ramdisk vs. NFS
>>>> just for network init.
>>>>
>>>> Ideas?
>>>
>>> Just as a data point, the debos scripts should be very close to what I was
>>> using when I tried NFS for running test suites. So I think it should be
>>> doable, but I don't know why it's happening.
>> Looks like this overlay is forcing a DHCP on all interfaces that begin with 'e'
>> https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-build/blob/master/jenkins/debian/debos/overlays/networkd/etc/systemd/network/wired.network
>>
>
> I just committed: https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-build-staging/pull/34
> I'm building the Debian rootfs builder job with this right now in
> staging, could you
> please test with the resulting images and tell if it works?

It works!

I tested the armel images (on both armel and arm64 boards) using
initrd.gpio.gz ramdisk with a pivot to the full.rootfs via NFS, and it
worked without a network reconfigure.  Yay!!

Note that I didn't test this with LAVA, I just used my local pyboot
setup, but I had to patch pyboot to deal with that automatic login.

@Matt: Is LAVA going to be confused by the automatic root login part?
Seems like when it sees the "login:" prompot, it will try to login, even
though a login isn't needed.

Kevin