From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Kevin Hilman" Subject: Re: New meeting time In-Reply-To: <20190326003527.jzeviygligmbfkiy@xps.therub.org> References: <20190325112258.GA7284@sirena.org.uk> <20190326003527.jzeviygligmbfkiy@xps.therub.org> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:20:29 -0700 Message-ID: <7hy34xwqaq.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: To: kernelci@groups.io, dan.rue@linaro.org, kernelci@groups.io, matthew.hart@linaro.org Cc: Mark Brown "Dan Rue" writes: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:27:52AM +0000, Matt Hart wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 11:23, Mark Brown wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > It's been just over a week since I sent out the doodle[1] for the new >> > meeting time and we've got responses in. The top options we have allow >> > everyone to attend (at least acording to the survey!): >> > >> > 10 - Monday 14:00 >> > - Tuesday 16:00 >> > - Friday 15:00 (I will have a conflict every other week) >> > 9 - Monday 15:00 (but no Guillaume) >> > >> > with a bunch of other options with 8 votes. I don't know what my >> > schedule is going to be like in a month or so but I'm guessing the other >> > slots should be fine for me. Given that practically speaking it's >> > difficult for Kevin to attend the Monday 14:00 slot I propose that we go >> > with the Tuesday 16:00 slot since that's the latest one and therefore >> > most friendly to those on PST. Thoughts? >> >> Makes sense to me, as long as it definitely works for our PST folks > > Is there any objection to making the meeting an open invite, and > advertising it on the wiki and the weekly minutes? No objection from me, as long as it's clear that this is a call for developers working on kernelCI, not a generic support call. Kevin