Re: [kernelci] Meeting Minutes for 2018-08-20

["Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>]

Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@gmail.com> writes:

[...]

> I like Kevin's suggestion of having sets in sets, in fact that's
> something we were discussing yesterday with Ana.  Here's a
> pseudo-schema I think would work well:
>
> TestCase:
>   * name
>   * result
>   * meta-data
>
> TestGroup:
>   * name
>   * meta-data
>   * list of test cases
>   * list of test groups
>
> Think of it a bit like a file system, with groups being
> directories and cases files.  You can have groups within
> groups...  This can scale both ways, to have sets within suites,
> and also suites within a collection of suites or whatever we want
> to do with this.  Then we can have a way of calling them with
> some kind of path like suite/set/case, or suite.set.case, or just
> suite.case, or super-plan.suite.case or whatever it takes to
> store the test suite results.
>
> I believe the changes should be relatively simple, and should
> result in a simpler database schema than what we have now with
> suites & sets mixed up.

I like it!  Can support relatively flat (like we have today) or
arbitrary scaling.  

Kevin