From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"kernelci@groups.io" <kernelci@groups.io>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@collabora.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: kselftest tree on kernelci.org
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 15:48:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8813e862-c280-c6c6-abc5-b62b372ff34a@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc705b2c-b2d7-c80f-7020-ee52a2aeb061@collabora.com>
On 2/3/22 11:19 AM, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> On 02/02/2022 15:23, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>
> I see these 4 branches (fixes, next, kunit, kunit-fixes) are all
> merged into linux-next. So it seems like the best thing to do
> would be to cover them with a very lightweight number of builds and
> tests focused on what they are about: only run kselftest on the
> fixes and next branches, and only KUnit on kunit and kunit-fixes.
> At the moment, KUnit is not run by kernelci.org (coming soon) so I
> think we could just add the next branch for kselftest. Then
> linux-next will be tested with maximum coverage anyway so if
> something subtle gets missed with the early tests it should get
> caught the following day at the latest with linux-next.
>
>>> Many things could potentially be done with arbitrary builds and
>>> tests etc. These are some initial suggestions. How does this
>>> sound?
>>
Sounds good to me. The things that tend to break are:
- test builds at times due to seemingly innocuous changes to fix
static analysis warnings. build test is good for catching these
-
>> Sounds great to me. Since selftest patches flow through various
>> subsystem trees, having kernelci keep an eye is great. This would
>> be another pair of eyes in addition to occasional tests I run and
>> Linaro (LKTP) monitoring next.
>>
>> How often do you send reports - I will watch out for them. Thanks
>> again for taking the initiative to add kselftest to kernelci.
>
> Builds and tests are run every time a new revision is detected on
> the branches being monitored. Then when they complete, a report
> is sent. It can take a while, but with a small number of builds
> you could get results within an hour. We could get the reports
> sent to the linux-kselftest mailing list and your own address if
> you want.
>
Please send it to my email address as well.
> Also this configuration is all under source control on GitHub so
> feel free to make changes to it in the future as you see fit.
>
Will do.
thanks,
-- Shuah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 13:32 kselftest tree on kernelci.org Guillaume Tucker
2022-02-02 15:23 ` Shuah Khan
2022-02-03 18:19 ` Guillaume Tucker
2022-02-03 22:48 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8813e862-c280-c6c6-abc5-b62b372ff34a@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guillaume.tucker@collabora.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kernelci@groups.io \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox