Re: Contributing ARM tests results to KCIDB

Nikolai Kondrashov
2020-09-17T13:52:30Z

Hi Christian,

On 9/17/20 3:50 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi Nikolai,
>
> I work at ARM in the Kernel team and, in short, we'd like certainly to
> contribute our internal Kernel test results to KCIDB.

Wonderful!

> After having attended your LPC2020 TestMC and KernelCI/BoF, I've now cooked
> up some KCIDB JSON test report (seemingly valid against your KCIDB v3 schema)
> and I'd like to start experimenting with kci-submit (on non-production
> instances), so as to assess how to fit our results into your schema and maybe
> contribute with some new KCIDB requirements if strictly needed.

Great, this is exactly what we need, welcome aboard :)

Please don't hesitate to reach out on kernelci@groups.io or on #kernelci on
freenode.net, if you have any questions, problems, or requirements.

> Is it possible to get some valid credentials and a playground instance to
> point at ?

Absolutely, I created credentials for you and sent them in a separate message.

You can use origin "arm" for the start, unless you have multiple CI systems
and want to differentiate them somehow in your reports.

Nick

On 9/17/20 3:50 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi Nikolai,
>
> I work at ARM in the Kernel team and, in short, we'd like certainly to
> contribute our internal Kernel test results to KCIDB.
>
> After having attended your LPC2020 TestMC and KernelCI/BoF, I've now cooked
> up some KCIDB JSON test report (seemingly valid against your KCIDB v3 schema)
> and I'd like to start experimenting with kci-submit (on non-production
> instances), so as to assess how to fit our results into your schema and maybe
> contribute with some new KCIDB requirements if strictly needed.
>
> Is it possible to get some valid credentials and a playground instance to
> point at ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
>
> Cristian
>
>
>
>
>