From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A3714F81 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CA251F45E; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:58:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1695369498; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Rxsy5LPAHP1WBgKOtgnA5M4j2ewKdmJ7ZeNWgSslu2U=; b=QmnRADwH5HvaOiAyjgWkRSRps90pIy750I7Sxc6xEebmDtAOPs4NHrdg8g8M4YEXRmLXIc yAo1a4yGXaO9BSKEmaaREBL2FcR4Z6qupkMfDFiq8Gv5MVaB1wcCcefsBEWzrRHGkQZeGn fwfHyhCJR1p3OClQAmhnyrVjSCvD3/Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1695369498; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Rxsy5LPAHP1WBgKOtgnA5M4j2ewKdmJ7ZeNWgSslu2U=; b=EE0waXfcJUEY2tDcXwxUaHMy0/++6qNU0vGLWU6RCtViHyRrF9Ypt6UKzakFivna9IVdYB RWmaBLYgbkpdZDCA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F2F13478; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id UUwvDBpJDWVHLQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:58:18 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:59:03 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Tim Bird Cc: "guillaume.tucker@collabora.com" , "kernelci@lists.linux.dev" , "automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [Automated-testing] kci command line poll: Click or Typer? Message-ID: References: <9acfa649-4ae0-2e56-16b8-b7c24ab60a30@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kernelci@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi! > I see exactly 0% of the people saying to stay with argparse, but that would be my recommendation. > The rationale for this is that argparse is old and unlikely to be changed in an incompatible way in > some future version of Python. +1 We recently started to work on new tooling for running LTP tests written in python and after a few up and downs we ended up with using the bare minimum of modules we can get away with. Less is clearly more in this context. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz