From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com (mail-ej1-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EF8D514 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 11:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9ad8bf9bfabso384079766b.3 for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 04:57:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696420625; x=1697025425; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Fak30zwIiRXPdGytZy+WPP26tw0Ab0tFEc/CFJJqvio=; b=I4X4B/aC11Mw7JHwDwv4N5fu1RtId++2frqTKrX79LGjtPMD9UycWW4Y6//SHVlJNF MkDlv2XgZ8b0bix/AvGudpxVMlNDA9VUv2HrkqknMA4iYqwyf02L/4Yr7eSft5ZXFN3y TxC38c5WWcCHfbFcoxSw7aNc7C6VMtcnJOb7poRo3cqrlG0BVV0rFo+W+4xERs7o59CW kcgXfzNR7OgbuvMmiWJ1s2NaEjcMcSLm0GtihvPPL+oV4xZAuGSq3lcf5Pcl39GOfn3q MldvRcrw4+xXi2BIstJkx4j2Yrw12SfO1i5NtrNUkzrjVD/63H73U9HcSzlaKPwx8bRT AZ2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696420625; x=1697025425; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Fak30zwIiRXPdGytZy+WPP26tw0Ab0tFEc/CFJJqvio=; b=SwLh45vSuCPbzLFzQ1SUQ+EG8VKJeNb+NA6hYNT0hmV73j/WFLX8WZEBqjlUlVGM2x +nGC2qRCDrHz3qayy4Gn6GEu+XjiiZ3kreyie8xnaa7ThiaqDDoEFBqSYxpKqE0LuVGi Wprtj0ycF0oxytPhs3sK4P3KNrC7BN1DQsvuDiqisznH4W6gm/njeQmz96coG5rpho3S RIBnODcPczxG3K3wtRRLm8/Qk79o7mEDPCpxLaQzie1Zpki3tzW+HlxAvOEyID9GzhJV ZaxXsxZM/h49Azu+Ds9TbBmEC0/ke3BkHRkSjno9m9N8mpb86iHV1Tbx1YqbepwQPwvb gC1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZ6DKfHJDJCiUpaXJH8eFdhSLtVi9+m4DEvUjnupwEVFurP8da JBTqBdOmsN2qWJW/luFEm2Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE03ZTyX7Eihovbzbz3HYkX9qA5aSQe4jD1PMIq/BajgzJB0aV3dLHpGoiupjoaZgiSKEEsmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3289:b0:9ae:3e72:7c72 with SMTP id 9-20020a170906328900b009ae3e727c72mr1818051ejw.58.1696420625095; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 04:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (1F2EF530.nat.pool.telekom.hu. [31.46.245.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u16-20020a17090657d000b009937e7c4e54sm2681045ejr.39.2023.10.04.04.57.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Oct 2023 04:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ingo Molnar Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 13:57:01 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Guillaume Tucker Cc: x86@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , kernelci-results@groups.io, kernelci@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: Request: better kernelCI reporting format [was: Re: tip/master baseline: 48 runs, 4 regressions (v6.6-rc4-243-g46219a3ac1db)] Message-ID: References: <651d30c3.170a0220.b0a5a.85ad@mx.google.com> <13d74236-ac7b-4ebe-5bbd-ffd59b76929f@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kernelci@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13d74236-ac7b-4ebe-5bbd-ffd59b76929f@collabora.com> * Guillaume Tucker wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. We're well aware of the issues with > these email reports and there's already a plan to entirely rework > them with the new KernelCI implementation currently under way. Cool! :-) > In particular, there will be improvements around tracking known > issues which will also help enabling bisection email reports > again. Replying to the original thread with the patch from the > lore archives is the ideal way to report issues, and bisections > as well as "pre-merge" testing of patches allows this. > > Regressions that haven't led to a successful bisection will need > to be reported similarly to what we have here but as you > highlighted, repeating known information is not useful. The > emails could for example just mention new regressions, and > provide a link to the new web dashboard with more details about > all known regressions. > > If these current email reports are mostly causing noise on the > x86 list and aren't useful then I would suggest to filter them > out for now or we can just stop sending them until we have a > better reporting system in place, in the coming months. Nah, they are still quite useful - which is why I'm complaining about the format :-) Thanks, Ingo