Re: Contributing ARM tests results to KCIDB

["Nikolai Kondrashov" <Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com>]

Hi Christian,

On 9/17/20 3:50 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
 > Hi Nikolai,
 >
 > I work at ARM in the Kernel team and, in short, we'd like certainly to
 > contribute our internal Kernel test results to KCIDB.

Wonderful!

 > After having attended your LPC2020 TestMC and KernelCI/BoF, I've now cooked
 > up some KCIDB JSON test report (seemingly valid against your KCIDB v3 schema)
 > and I'd like to start experimenting with kci-submit (on non-production
 > instances), so as to assess how to fit our results into your schema and maybe
 > contribute with some new KCIDB requirements if strictly needed.

Great, this is exactly what we need, welcome aboard :)

Please don't hesitate to reach out on kernelci@groups.io or on #kernelci on
freenode.net, if you have any questions, problems, or requirements.

 > Is it possible to get some valid credentials and a playground instance to
 > point at ?

Absolutely, I created credentials for you and sent them in a separate message.

You can use origin "arm" for the start, unless you have multiple CI systems
and want to differentiate them somehow in your reports.

Nick

On 9/17/20 3:50 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
 > Hi Nikolai,
 >
 > I work at ARM in the Kernel team and, in short, we'd like certainly to
 > contribute our internal Kernel test results to KCIDB.
 >
 > After having attended your LPC2020 TestMC and KernelCI/BoF, I've now cooked
 > up some KCIDB JSON test report (seemingly valid against your KCIDB v3 schema)
 > and I'd like to start experimenting with kci-submit (on non-production
 > instances), so as to assess how to fit our results into your schema and maybe
 > contribute with some new KCIDB requirements if strictly needed.
 >
 > Is it possible to get some valid credentials and a playground instance to
 > point at ?
 >
 > Thanks
 >
 > Regards
 >
 > Cristian
 >
 >
 > 
 >
 >