From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EA249F60 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="GLtq10/E" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701880305; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vaxlh8wJXgliq/77VlAO9+epZ3Cym7OmXbevnFZtFZE=; b=GLtq10/E5ufdZDueJYM9Vkk7d8h3IZFUrSkom1T8T5l1Y4t5oUV26LGTfzVSMlc3DPlXp5 L6nIbjNJDBN9FEfKLH5GOLx1IUaGM/rEMCBpiPR9TK2b/idpQWTdBUZyA+PYxv/y/Zz9ld o6OKGUNuYd/7EKMsDrTlDmnfFM6uc2Y= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-397-XlDns83FOiSp6-p3fc43Xg-1; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 11:31:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: XlDns83FOiSp6-p3fc43Xg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-333405020afso851014f8f.3 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:31:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701880303; x=1702485103; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vaxlh8wJXgliq/77VlAO9+epZ3Cym7OmXbevnFZtFZE=; b=stfb2c64btljF9XXF/unCQfAifdiyj7kLStPpW1MLjTjzIGJoNqGWWidledWkzXn1K PZ1FUwVJ74jjduEnSZK1EnE476y5yjaJ31jsMA9659d5NkeGT5NHW3uaH/5U0sPcDpwM 4HAE8nYPSLRvWjvSmzbEZM/G2Z+Zi9tqkcKJmmgQwjyitcQt7lIYM/JXRA0ZtouIwj18 TlyKgMNzyHgWt/Luvjhkf002/QNU7+P9LaM3hbeP7SpzQbMeUPQb+vzK8H483c28bqgR lWNvrr/wEDfngUXABUnGlRLykzrNOXueUiRFcfANn/yj4QwrqjOstDu954fqK/PP7Cba qA1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzcPPHSv4KG4wh1Ri6Vh6PB3yPIpr0dkwWPOCrwAtW5r0GNdyHf 3RfW8HUcX0rlWyXa9Naaob9wJpg46VTE1LoQV89gNfDilmsV97GdlD45LkIiob7MdYJ3wYG99vS 1ByiwHKCkIldVOt4nnEU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:198e:b0:40b:5e1d:839e with SMTP id t14-20020a05600c198e00b0040b5e1d839emr811328wmq.50.1701880303696; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:31:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEFKdeeY63Rr8GYbgHOkzsiRaLtwhKYRqy4GAdN5mZSrmYVw/I5CHGSTTjMHCUL/zUr0j0s6g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:198e:b0:40b:5e1d:839e with SMTP id t14-20020a05600c198e00b0040b5e1d839emr811312wmq.50.1701880303404; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.118] (88-113-27-52.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [88.113.27.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w4-20020adfec44000000b003333dd777a4sm81663wrn.46.2023.12.06.08.31.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:31:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:31:40 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kernelci@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] docs: submitting-patches: Introduce Tested-with: To: Jonathan Corbet , workflows@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches , Andy Whitcroft , Theodore Ts'o , David Gow , Steven Rostedt , Mark Brown , Shuah Khan , "Darrick J . Wong" Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Veronika Kabatova , CKI , kernelci@lists.linux.dev References: <20231115175146.9848-1-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> <20231205184503.79769-1-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> <20231205184503.79769-5-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> <87zfyomq5k.fsf@meer.lwn.net> From: Nikolai Kondrashov In-Reply-To: <87zfyomq5k.fsf@meer.lwn.net> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/5/23 20:59, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Nikolai Kondrashov writes: > >> Introduce a new tag, 'Tested-with:', documented in the >> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst file. >> >> The tag is expected to contain the test suite command which was executed >> for the commit, and to certify it passed. Additionally, it can contain a >> URL pointing to the execution results, after a '#' character. >> >> Prohibit the V: field from containing the '#' character correspondingly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nikolai Kondrashov >> --- >> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 10 ++++++++++ >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4 ++-- >> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > I have to ask whether we *really* need to introduce yet another tag for > this. How are we going to use this information? Are we going to try to > make a tag for every way in which somebody might test a patch? How I understand the purpose of this is that, first, people want to encourage submitters to test their patches with the relevant test suites, and second, if they do, to tell them they did. That is all. The idea of Tested-with: is to specify *which* test was executed, so I don't think we would need another tag. However, I let people (all copied) who expressed interest in this in the first place, and had this discussed earlier, chime in. I have no specific interest in this particular way, I just want kernel testing to improve. If it was for me, I'd rather encourage everyone to just use GitLab or GitHub, post MRs/PRs (like millions of other projects do, including other operating systems), have tests executed automatically, results recorded and archived automatically, commits linked to those results automatically, and not mess around with any tags :D Nick