Re: [kernelci-members] Working with the KernelCI project

Nikolai Kondrashov
2020-10-01T16:28:47Z

On 10/1/20 7:03 PM, Dmitry Vyukov via groups.io wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 5:55 PM Nikolai Kondrashov <spbnick@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/1/20 6:36 PM, Dmitry Vyukov via groups.io wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 5:12 PM Nikolai Kondrashov
>> > <Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 10/1/20 6:01 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:48 PM Nikolai Kondrashov
>> >> > <Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> >> * Could you move the "dashboard" link out of test's "output_files", and into
>> >> >> a "misc" field? It won't be presented as a link in Grafana unfortunately,
>> >> >> but "output_files" is for something which could be useful when downloaded
>> >> >> (and e.g. re-hosted by KCIDB), and the linked HTML doesn't seem to be.
>> >> >> Let's deal with the dashboard link issue in
>> >> >> https://github.com/kernelci/kcidb/issues/93
>> >> >
>> >> > Any suggestions/precedents for the name?
>> >> > dashboard_link? origin_link? master_link?
>> >>
>> >> There's a PR linked which adds "origin_url":
>> >> https://github.com/kernelci/kcidb/pull/94
>> >
>> > I've implemented all suggested improvements, please check this one:
>> > https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/d/test/test?orgId=1&var-dataset=playground_kernelci04&var-id=syzkcidb:0a89a7b56db04c21a656
>> >
>> > Here is top-level link, look for the "https:" one:
>> > https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/d/home/home?orgId=1&refresh=30m&from=now-90d&to=now&var-origin=syzkcidb&var-git_repository_url=All&var-dataset=playground_kernelci04
>>
>> Niice!
>>
>> Although, can you use just the "syzbot" origin? It's going to be easier to
>> identify and remember for everyone, as it matches your branding.
>
> That's a different origin for entries I submit manually for testing purposes.
> The actual production implementation will submit everything as "syzbot".
> I am not sure what origin I should use for the manual tool. Using a
> different origin has some advantages, e.g. we can see that there are 3
> dups but that was submitted manually.

Ah, I see. Yes, that's useful.

Nick