From: moon.linux@yahoo.com (Anand Moon)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:00:28 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1218844080.996910.1422342028538.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D76104AF467C9F418519BEF4906C06E40F6A5C87@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
Hi Giridhara,
http://ark.intel.com/products/64622/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-4650-20M-Cache-2_70-GHz-8_00-GTs-Intel-QPI
Show it has only 8 core of CPU. Why are you setting the CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64.
certainly it will have a issue in the kernel.
-Anand Moon
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:27 AM, Giridhara RP (grp) <grp@cisco.com> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:15 AM
To: Giridhara RP (grp)
Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:06:00 +0000, "Giridhara RP (grp)" said:
> Which kernel version should I use to solve this crash/panic?
That will depend on exactly why you're still running a 2.6.32 kernel from 6 years ago. Remember - the fact it's all the way up to 2.6.32.65 doesn't mean you have all the bugfixes. It only means you have all the bugfixes that qualified for the -stable side of the fence (which is a small fraction of all the fixes that have happened in the past 6 years).
-----------------------
Hi Valdis,
We were running 2.6.32.60 assuming it's a stable build and my assumption was wrong :(. Should I go ahead with stable 3.18.3 [2015-01-16 ].
Thanks
Giri
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-27 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-27 0:06 Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung Giridhara RP (grp)
2015-01-27 2:48 ` Greg KH
2015-01-27 3:52 ` Giridhara RP (grp)
2015-01-27 4:01 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2015-01-27 4:06 ` Giridhara RP (grp)
2015-01-27 4:45 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2015-01-27 4:56 ` Giridhara RP (grp)
2015-01-27 7:00 ` Anand Moon [this message]
2015-01-27 8:09 ` Giridhara RP (grp)
2015-01-27 8:25 ` Jan Niggemann
2015-01-27 8:37 ` Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
2015-01-27 14:34 ` Greg KH
2015-01-27 17:02 ` Giridhara RP (grp)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-27 0:29 Giridhara RP (grp)
2015-01-30 5:36 Giridhara RP (grp)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1218844080.996910.1422342028538.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com \
--to=moon.linux@yahoo.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).