[PATCH] staging: Fix checkpatch issue with brackets in rtw_ap.c

From: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com (Jeff Kirsher)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: Fix checkpatch issue with brackets in rtw_ap.c
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:28:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1413955702.31712.11.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54473B0D.1010805@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 01:05 -0400, nick wrote:
> Good to hear, I will try tomorrow to send it a correct patch fixing out the issues like the one found 
> in this patch in the same file. I am pretty certain I known how to do a patch how.
> Nick 

Take your time Nick, please do not rush it.  You have shown that when
you rush things, nothing but bad things happen.

> 
> On 14-10-22 12:50 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:31:25PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Fix checkpatch error message with opening bracket of if statement,
> >>> not being on the same line as a if statement in rtw_ap.c
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_ap.c | 3 +--
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> I will say, it does appear you finally got a patch right.  Only issue
> > i agree to that. Finally Nick has sent a patch which is not having any style error, applies properly , doesnot change the logic.
> >> I have is that you corrected only one of the many instances of the
> >> same problem in this file.
> >> If you are going to correct one instance, might as well fix them all.
> > don't you think if he tries to fix them all at one go, he will again mess up everything ?
> > 
> > thanks
> > sudip
> >>
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_ap.c
> >>> index 6b4092f..927b2a6 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_ap.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_ap.c
> >>> @@ -1567,8 +1567,7 @@ void bss_cap_update_on_sta_join23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, struct sta_info
> >>>                 }
> >>>         }
> >>>
> >>> -       if (rtw_ht_operation_update(padapter) > 0)
> >>> -       {
> >>> +       if (rtw_ht_operation_update(padapter) > 0) {
> >>>                 update_beacon23a(padapter, WLAN_EID_HT_CAPABILITY, NULL, false);
> >>>                 update_beacon23a(padapter, WLAN_EID_HT_OPERATION, NULL, true);
> >>>         }
> >>> --
> >>> 1.9.1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> >>> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> >>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jeff
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> >> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> >> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20141021/4d65de01/attachment-0001.bin 