From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle)
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 20:02:44 +0100
Subject: realmode _WAKEUP
In-Reply-To: <CANCZXo6ox65UOFy+5dfXuM+p19GQ6TuwTUgSLJ-wySitsuRKNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANCZXo50TitfuhQSupdX1m2vPsDCpTFywmQ_w-RoJ4_JG-Tx-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<1420649650.438.8.camel@x220>
	<CANCZXo5v-H1_q_qzk=SOoPqnY-hZ+LxNzaapx8OPv4U5Mq5Zcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANCZXo6ox65UOFy+5dfXuM+p19GQ6TuwTUgSLJ-wySitsuRKNw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1420657364.24143.23.camel@x220>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 00:02 +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
> As i understood correctly we compile wakeup-objs only if
> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is 'y', but than why we pass -D_WAKEUP everytime,
> even CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is not y?

I really don't know whether wakeup-objs is compiled only for the 'y'
case. Did you test this with both 'm' and 'y'? But, anyhow, suppose
that's correct: who cares if a preprocessor macro is always defined but
not always used? What's the problem?


Paul Bolle