From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: o@zgur.org (Ozgur Kara)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 08:22:03 +0300
Subject: Is there mailist about LSM
In-Reply-To: <1527718237.1199792.1391056912.11DCE2E8@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1527700573.1073529.1390735608.275C3A8D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <56012.1527701120@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
 <1527701845.1082359.1390760976.092478F1@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <65026.1527703555@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
 <1527704011.1098198.1390804752.297ADD3D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <69732.1527704792@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
 <1527718237.1199792.1391056912.11DCE2E8@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <1725001527744123@web4g.yandex.ru>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org


Hi all,

@Valdis and @Ivanov you can see the new LSM list archive, Paul Moore helped.
Thanks Dear Paul.

http://kernsec.org/pipermail/linux-security-module-archive/

Regards

Ozgur

31.05.2018, 01:12, "Alexander Ivanov" <amivanov@fastmail.com>:
> On Wed, 30 May 2018 14:26 -0400, valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>> ?On Wed, 30 May 2018 11:13:31 -0700, Alexander Ivanov said:
>>
>> ?> > There's some support for one "large" LSM and a "trivial" one like yama.
>> ?>
>> ?> What this some support would be then?
>>
>> ?Basically, there's a pointer for an LSM-private blob, and no support
>> ?for a chain of blobs.
>
> I do no need blobs, as I said, it's stateless.
> The question was how to register a subset of hooks that may overlap with another module(s).
>
>> ?> Suppose I have stateless LSM, don't really interested in using any objects' blobs.
>>
>> ?Congrats. You just re-invented YAMA. :)
>
> Exactly! Isn't learn and re-use a good linux approach ;)
>