kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Confusion in kobjects
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 07:59:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110504145937.GA12659@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTina-q5sGJ4hOOHBbjKdqHqLSEGM+w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 07:26:44PM +0530, Vikram Narayanan wrote:
> The kernel doc (kobject.txt) says that
> 
> "No structure should EVER have more than one kobject embedded within it.
>  If it does, the reference counting for the object is sure to be messed
>  up and incorrect, and your code will be buggy.  So do not do this. "
> 
> But in the file drivers/uio/uio.c, a structure has two such kobjects.
> 
> struct uio_device {
>          struct module           *owner;
>          struct device           *dev;
>          int                     minor;
>          atomic_t                event;
>          struct fasync_struct    *async_queue;
>          wait_queue_head_t       wait;
>          int                     vma_count;
>          struct uio_info         *info;
>          struct kobject          *map_dir;
>          struct kobject          *portio_dir;
>  };
> 
> So, What is the exception for this structure? Is this right? If yes,
> can someone explain why it is right, and where should we use it?

There are not more than one kobject _IN_ the structure.  It merely
has pointers to more than one kobject (three actually), which is fine to
do.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-04 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-04 13:56 Confusion in kobjects Vikram Narayanan
2011-05-04 14:59 ` Greg KH [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-04 16:26 Vikram Narayanan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110504145937.GA12659@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).