From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: j.neuschaefer@gmx.net (Jonathan =?utf-8?Q?Neusch=C3=A4fer?=)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:04:09 +0200
Subject: Questions about User Mode Linux
In-Reply-To: <20111012173226.GB2241@grml>
References: <201110121915219066339@gmail.com> <20111012152500.GA2241@grml>
	<20111012173226.GB2241@grml>
Message-ID: <20111012180409.GA24006@debian.debian>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:32:26PM +0200, michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On 17:25 Wed 12 Oct     , michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com wrote:
> ...
> > 3) Sometimes UML is a real pain. When I upgrade my testing kernel, I usually
> >    have to spend some time searching the internet for fixes. I do not remember
> >    this error, tough. You can find my current (3.0) kernel at
> >    http://repo.or.cz/w/cor.git , if you are interested.
> 
> Oh, no. After migrating to 64bit my UML is broken again...

Sounds interesting :)

Please report this kind of things, if you think you've hit a bug.
(MAINTAINERS or the output of "scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/um"
tells you where to send your mails)

Thanks,
	Jonathan Neusch?fer