From: j.neuschaefer@gmx.net (Jonathan Neuschäfer)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Does Linux process exist information leakage?
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:45:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120116234529.GA1542@debian.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFB9KM1PWSw1A=PAfLc-0sr3Xq1UUtqmUaCZ1_eTj=xRkn_7XA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 01:19:22PM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> Let me walk you guys through how this bug could be exploited.
> The file that you want to access is blocked from you by file system
> permissions. The root user (uid==0) can access this file (that contains
> credentials) and read it into memory that it has malloc()'ed. After the
> process running as root is done, it free()'s the memory without zeroing it
> out. Now you (you clever hacker) spawn a process that requests memory in
> large hunks. It then searches for the string "password=" in that memory.
> Since the memory was free()'ed back to the pool without being changed, it
> still contains the original information that was in the file that you
> cannot read. Does this make sense, or should I go into t a bit more detail?
But can you actually get this dirty memory on Linux?
I know two sources of memory that are used by malloc. One is brk(), the
other is mmapped pages of /dev/zero. With /dev/zero it's obvious that
you get empty pages (all-zero); with brk I wasn't sure so I wrote the
test program below and ran it. I didn't find any dirty (non-zero) memory.
Thanks,
Jonathan Neusch?fer
--
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define BLOCKSZ (1024 * 1024) /* one Mibi */
int main(void)
{
int maxmb = 1024;
unsigned i;
void *BRK;
BRK = sbrk(0);
for (i = 0; i < maxmb; i++) {
void *block = sbrk(BLOCKSZ);
unsigned j, *p;
if (block == (void *) -1) {
printf("sbrk failed after %u blocks (%u bytes)\n", i, i * BLOCKSZ);
break;
}
for (p = block, j = BLOCKSZ/sizeof(unsigned int); j--; p++)
if (*p)
printf("found data@BRK+%p: %u\n", ((void *)p) - BRK, *p);
}
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-16 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-11 12:53 Does Linux process exist information leakage? 夏业添
2012-01-11 16:23 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2012-01-11 16:45 ` Dave Hylands
2012-01-11 17:52 ` Scott Lovenberg
2012-01-12 2:14 ` 夏业添
2012-01-12 17:00 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2012-01-16 18:19 ` Scott Lovenberg
2012-01-16 23:45 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer [this message]
2012-01-19 14:47 ` Scott Lovenberg
2012-01-16 18:45 ` Greg Freemyer
2012-01-16 20:44 ` Scott Lovenberg
2012-01-12 2:05 ` 夏业添
2012-01-11 18:44 ` Greg Freemyer
2012-01-19 20:23 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <CAOfVmNFuBCjWb7-5rJaU7ksgcU8LyAW15JiEwa2PigZL3zC0aw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-01-12 2:30 ` 夏业添
2012-01-18 1:53 ` Fredrick
[not found] ` <CAOfVmNFN-GLDwkfLKG11iw7-p6KerDmyoMxV1oSD5WSYJMXc0g@mail.gmail.com>
2012-01-18 11:43 ` beyond.hack
2012-01-19 1:27 ` 夏业添
2012-01-19 7:12 ` SaNtosh kuLkarni
2012-01-19 8:37 ` SaNtosh kuLkarni
2012-01-20 6:52 ` Fredrick
2012-01-19 14:48 ` Scott Lovenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120116234529.GA1542@debian.debian \
--to=j.neuschaefer@gmx.net \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).