From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:31:45 -0400
Subject: ubuntu 11.10, systemtap and building my own kernel
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1204101422150.19514@oneiric>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1204100816440.15334@oneiric>
	<y0mwr5n8oi1.fsf@fche.csb>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1204101422150.19514@oneiric>
Message-ID: <20120410183145.GB27589@redhat.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

Hi -

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 02:23:43PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> [...]
> ok, but i'm curious ... i took a quick look at earlier kernels and i
> don't see where "struct hlist_head" *ever* had a "next" member field
> that is required by this version of systemtap (1.4).

I believe this was related to a viro's linux commit 9591718a5a.

> can you clarify which kernel version(s) would have worked with this
> version of systemtap?  thanks.

According to http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2011-q1/msg00036.html,
it was run with 2.6.9 ... 2.6.37.

- FChE