kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: michi1@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com (michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Kernel latency for handling the Network traffic
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:54:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120503135444.GA10940@grml> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <333797351DE86B4BA5EE7CC1C71C79A94796167AEE@CLUSTEREDMB.intranet.com>

Hi!

On 16:33 Thu 03 May     , Suresh Kumar Subramanian wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am building the router based on linux kernel.
> 
> The hardware details are below,
> 2 - 64 bit quad core processor (3Ghz core).
> RAM-  24GB RAM.
> PCI express slot- connected with Quad Port 100Mbps Ethernet adapter -2. (so total 8 ethernet interfaces)
> 
> 
> I just want to calculate the maximum traffic the  router can handle..?.
> 
> The maximum traffic could be, also 8  ports(100Mbps) * 2 directions = 1600Mbps.
> 
> Can this system(kernel + hardware) handle this much traffic. (Assume the best case)?

Yes, it can. I have seen a benchmark which basically said that a single quad
core cpu with ~3GHz was enough for about 4 links with 10 *gigabit* each.

That said, VPNs can slow down processing dramatically, iptables less so. If
you want to saturate links with 10 gigabit, you need to use a special qdisc,
which might prevent you to do QoS.

> I think,  There is calculation to identify the packet processing time in linux kernel (kernel & hw cpu freq). I am not aware of this.

What do you mean?

	-Michi
-- 
programing a layer 3+4 network protocol for mesh networks
see http://michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-03 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-03  8:40 Logging sensitive information from kernel (while atomic and uninterrupted) Panagiotis Sakkos
2012-05-03 11:03 ` Kernel latency for handling the Network traffic Suresh Kumar Subramanian
2012-05-03 13:54   ` michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com [this message]
2012-05-03 16:47     ` Abu Rasheda
2012-05-03 19:52       ` michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com
2012-05-04  2:43 ` Logging sensitive information from kernel (while atomic and uninterrupted) Anirban Roy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120503135444.GA10940@grml \
    --to=michi1@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).