gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[horse_rivers]

hi:

? I am trying to ?compile gcc2.95.3 ,after I patch ?source code , and configure , make?

? fail with this :gcc-2.95.3/libio/streambuf.h:37: parse error before `}'

? I find this line is ? ? 35??extern "C" {
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?36 ? ?#include <libio.h>
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 37 }

how can I fix this error?


thanks?

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar]

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:10 PM, horse_rivers <horse_rivers@126.com> wrote:

> hi:
>
>   I am trying to  compile gcc2.95.3 ,after I patch  source code , and
> configure , make
>
>   fail with this :gcc-2.95.3/libio/streambuf.h:37: parse error before `}'
>
>   I find this line is     35  extern "C" {
>                                36    #include <libio.h>
>                               37 }
>
> how can I fix this error?
>
> Try this list, you may get a better answer:
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/

>
> thanks?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>



-- 
Thank you
Warm Regards
Anuz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20121219/1525dfb5/attachment.html 

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear horse_rivers,

On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:10:07 +0800 (CST), horse_rivers wrote:

> ? I am trying to ?compile gcc2.95.3 ,after I patch ?source code , and configure , make?

Do you know we are in 2012 ?

Some people are even saying that the end of the world will be in two
days. So what do you risk at trying with a sane, recent, version of
gcc, instead of the prehistoric 2.95 version?

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[Yann Droneaud]

Le mercredi 19 d?cembre 2012 ? 15:54 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit :
> Dear horse_rivers,
> 
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:10:07 +0800 (CST), horse_rivers wrote:
> 
> >   I am trying to  compile gcc2.95.3 ,after I patch  source code , and configure , make 
> 
> Do you know we are in 2012 ?
> 
> Some people are even saying that the end of the world will be in two
> days.

This is already the end of the world:

Zombie programs are coming back to live !
Blue screen of the death and such.

(hey, just kidding ;)

-- 
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[horse_rivers]

At?2012-12-19?22:54:30,"Thomas?Petazzoni"?<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>?wrote:
>Dear?horse_rivers,
>
>On?Wed,?19?Dec?2012?22:10:07?+0800?(CST),?horse_rivers?wrote:
>
>>???I?am?trying?to??compile?gcc2.95.3?,after?I?patch??source?code?,?and?configure?,?make?
>
>Do?you?know?we?are?in?2012??
>
>Some?people?are?even?saying?that?the?end?of?the?world?will?be?in?two
>days.?So?what?do?you?risk?at?trying?with?a?sane,?recent,?version?of
>gcc,?instead?of?the?prehistoric?2.95?version?

becasue i want to compile linux 2.6 version ?kernel ,which require ?gcc2.95.3

Best regards

>
>Best?regards,
>
>Thomas
>--?
>Thomas?Petazzoni,?Free?Electrons
>Kernel,?drivers,?real-time?and?embedded?Linux
>development,?consulting,?training?and?support.
>http://free-electrons.com

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[Bernd Petrovitsch]

On Don, 2012-12-20 at 11:11 +0800, horse_rivers wrote:
[....]
> becasue i want to compile linux 2.6 version  kernel ,which require  gcc2.95.3

2.6 as such covers the range of years - look at the release dates from
2.6.0 and 2.6.39.

And requirements are usually the minimum (here: oldest) version.
All remotely currently deployed gcc's (including from - but not limited
to - Debian/stable over RedHat-Enterprise-6 to SUSE/Novell with and
without updates) up to gcc-4.7.2 (most recent stable) should actually
work.

Known broken versions in between are explicitly checked

Kind regards,
	Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[horse_rivers]

At?2012-12-20?18:01:40,"Bernd?Petrovitsch"?<bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at>?wrote:
>On?Don,?2012-12-20?at?11:11?+0800,?horse_rivers?wrote:
>[....]
>>?becasue?i?want?to?compile?linux?2.6?version??kernel?,which?require??gcc2.95.3
>
>2.6?as?such?covers?the?range?of?years?-?look?at?the?release?dates?from
>2.6.0?and?2.6.39.
>
>And?requirements?are?usually?the?minimum?(here:?oldest)?version.
>All?remotely?currently?deployed?gcc's?(including?from?-?but?not?limited
>to?-?Debian/stable?over?RedHat-Enterprise-6?to?SUSE/Novell?with?and
>without?updates)?up?to?gcc-4.7.2?(most?recent?stable)?should?actually
>work.

that is saying the gcc4.7 can compile linux kernel 2.6.0-2.6.39 ??

Best Regards!

>
>Known?broken?versions?in?between?are?explicitly?checked
>
>Kind?regards,
>	Bernd
>--?
>Bernd?Petrovitsch??????????????????Email?:?bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at
>?????????????????????LUGA?:?http://www.luga.at
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Kernelnewbies?mailing?list
>Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[sundararaj reel]

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:11 AM, horse_rivers <horse_rivers@126.com> wrote:


> that is saying the gcc4.7 can compile linux kernel 2.6.0-2.6.39  ?
>
>
I would expect it to.

My 2.6.32 kernel was build by gcc4.4.3

$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.32-36-generic (buildd at zirconium) (gcc version 4.4.3
(Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) )


-- 

Sundararaj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20121221/e2a69cd5/attachment.html 

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[Bernd Petrovitsch]

On Fre, 2012-12-21 at 09:11 +0800, horse_rivers wrote:
> At 2012-12-20 18:01:40,"Bernd Petrovitsch" <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote:
> >On Don, 2012-12-20 at 11:11 +0800, horse_rivers wrote:
> >[....]
> >> becasue i want to compile linux 2.6 version  kernel ,which require  gcc2.95.3
> >
> >2.6 as such covers the range of years - look at the release dates from
> >2.6.0 and 2.6.39.
> >
> >And requirements are usually the minimum (here: oldest) version.
> >All remotely currently deployed gcc's (including from - but not limited
> >to - Debian/stable over RedHat-Enterprise-6 to SUSE/Novell with and
> >without updates) up to gcc-4.7.2 (most recent stable) should actually
> >work.
> 
> that is saying the gcc4.7 can compile linux kernel 2.6.0-2.6.39  ?

Short answer: Probably - it is worth a try.

Long answer: First, I would try the gcc from your distribution - it it
works, be done with it.
Than I would try a somewhat recent one - either a prepackaged one (beu I
do not know if such actually exist somewhere) or a self-`make
bootstrap`ped one (which is IMHO easy enough).

Recent ones should understand/compile also 10 years old source ....

	Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at

gcc 2.95.3 compile failure

[Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar]

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <
bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote:

> On Fre, 2012-12-21 at 09:11 +0800, horse_rivers wrote:
> > At 2012-12-20 18:01:40,"Bernd Petrovitsch" <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at>
> wrote:
> > >On Don, 2012-12-20 at 11:11 +0800, horse_rivers wrote:
> > >[....]
> > >> becasue i want to compile linux 2.6 version  kernel ,which require
>  gcc2.95.3
> > >
> > >2.6 as such covers the range of years - look at the release dates from
> > >2.6.0 and 2.6.39.
> > >
> > >And requirements are usually the minimum (here: oldest) version.
> > >All remotely currently deployed gcc's (including from - but not limited
> > >to - Debian/stable over RedHat-Enterprise-6 to SUSE/Novell with and
> > >without updates) up to gcc-4.7.2 (most recent stable) should actually
> > >work.
> >
> > that is saying the gcc4.7 can compile linux kernel 2.6.0-2.6.39  ?
>
> Short answer: Probably - it is worth a try.
>
> Long answer: First, I would try the gcc from your distribution - it it
> works, be done with it.
> Than I would try a somewhat recent one - either a prepackaged one (beu I
> do not know if such actually exist somewhere) or a self-`make
> bootstrap`ped one (which is IMHO easy enough).
>
> Recent ones should understand/compile also 10 years old source ....
>
> Why not use a buildroot  based tool chains or get an old toolchain and use
it as cross compiler. That should work for the most part.
Though it uses uclibc, you can replace it with normal libc.

        Bernd
> --
> Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at
>                      LUGA : http://www.luga.at
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>



-- 
Thank you
Warm Regards
Anuz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20121221/930f3c98/attachment.html