From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: j.neuschaefer@gmx.net (Jonathan =?utf-8?Q?Neusch=C3=A4fer?=)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:40:47 +0100
Subject: Creating scheduler
In-Reply-To: <10831.1360174582@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
References: <511297a5.2251420a.0e81.ffff8afe@mx.google.com>
	<10831.1360174582@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Message-ID: <20130206194047.GA3133@debian.debian>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:16:22PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> for high-density applications, there may be a upper limit on watts per second
> that you can cool, resulting in trade-offs being needed). Then there's cache

I'm sorry to ask, but don't you rather mean watts than watts per second?


Regards,
Jonathan Neusch?fer