kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gmate.amit@gmail.com (Kumar amit mehta)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: atomic operations
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:15:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130225071531.GA3434@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHnt0GUntzum7SD7t3z3nh17M02+TAa29n+VuCCb1N524X05TA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 08:53:20PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote:
> Another good article on atomicty and data sizes:
> 
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/pa-atom/
> 
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > in simple terms, any operation, in terms assembly instructions, which can
> > be executed in ONE instruction, is "atomic", because, just like an atom, it
> > cannot be broken up into parts.   any instructions that is longer than one,
> > for eg, TWO instruction, is NOT atomic, because in BETWEEN the first and
> > 2nd instruction, something like an interrupt can come in, and affect the
> > values of the operand when it is passed from instruction one to second
> > instruction.  To save me from reiteration:
> >
> > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/pa-dalign/ (search for
> > "atomicity").
> >
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/381244/purpose-of-memory-alignment
> >
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/260832/
> >
> > http://www.songho.ca/misc/alignment/dataalign.html
> >
> >
> > http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~palsetia/cit595s08/Lectures08/alignmentOrdering.pdf
> >
> > Essentially, atomicity and non-alignment become problematic when u tried
> > to to read using non-byte addressing mode with non-aligned address.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Shraddha Kamat <sh2008ka@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> what is the relation between atomic operations and memory alignment ?
> >>
> >> I read from UTLK that "an unaligned memory access is not atomic"
> >>
> >> please explain me , I am not able to get the relationship between
> >> memory alignment and atomicity of the operation.
It seems for this same reason, every objects of a struct page is organized as 
double word.
<snip from linux/mm_types.h>
 * The objects in struct page are organized in double word blocks in
 * order to allows us to use atomic double word operations on portions
 * of struct page. That is currently only used by slub but the arrangement
 * allows the use of atomic double word operations on the flags/mapping
 * and lru list pointers also.
<snip from linux/mm_types.h>

-Amit

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-25  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-24  9:42 atomic operations Shraddha Kamat
2013-02-24 10:50 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-02-24 23:24   ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2013-02-24 12:50 ` Peter Teoh
2013-02-24 12:53   ` Peter Teoh
2013-02-25  7:15     ` Kumar amit mehta [this message]
2013-03-01  5:44   ` Arun KS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130225071531.GA3434@gmail.com \
    --to=gmate.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).