kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: june.tune.sea@gmail.com (ishare)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: pthread_lock
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:10:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130313041048.GA2519@debian.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACPKTAMpYs5aNMUdmduA-j=yxP1_+i05u8+VoMW5maqZFuDwrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 06:18:02PM +0530, Prabhu nath wrote:
> I guess we should not mix mutex and condition variable. Both have their own
> respective semantics.
> *mutex* is used to serialize access to a shared resource among competing
> threads.
> *condition variable* is used to notify a* state change* of a resource to
> the interested thread.
> 
> In case of condition variable there is provision to explicitly notify a
> single thread(pthread_cond_signal) or all the threads waiting on a
> condition (or a state change) (pthread_cond_broadcast)
> 
> Question was on pthread_mutex_unlock() that whether this function
> invocation will trigger the movement of all the threads in the wait queue
> to the ready queue.
  
  After pthread_mutex_unlock() is called , the mutex is release , then ,which stuff 
  will reshcedule the threads in the waitqueue ?

  If do pthread_cond_signal() after each pthread_mutex_unlock() ,does it raise up the performence  ? 
 
  thanks!







> If all the threads are of equal priority, then the first thread waiting for
> the lock will be put to READY queue.
> If there are variable priority threads waiting for the lock, then the
> thread with highest priority would be woken up


  

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-13  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-05  4:44 pthread_lock ishare
2013-03-05  5:32 ` pthread_lock Mandeep Sandhu
2013-03-05  6:02   ` pthread_lock Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2013-03-05  8:09     ` pthread_lock Mandeep Sandhu
2013-03-05 10:05       ` pthread_lock ishare
2013-03-12 12:48         ` pthread_lock Prabhu nath
2013-03-13  4:10           ` ishare [this message]
2013-03-13  5:20             ` pthread_lock Prabhu nath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130313041048.GA2519@debian.localdomain \
    --to=june.tune.sea@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).