kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: michi1@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com (michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: net_device: limit rate ot tx packets
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:15:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130414061520.GA2288@grml> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130413141121.1aedb750@anton.lan>

Hi!

On 14:11 Sat 13 Apr     , christian+kn at wwad.de wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> can someone please explain me, how the kernel handles different
> transfer rates of different net_devices? Or in other words: How does
> the systemcall send() know, when to block?
> 
> An example:
>   cat /dev/zero | pv | nc -u <someip>
> will show different throughput speeds depending on the network device,
> the packets are sent over (wlan0 will be slower than eth0).
> 
>  - Can someone point out the location in the linux kernel source, where
>    this is handled?
> 
>  - If I register a net_device. How do I signal to the upper
>    network layers that my driver can only accept packets at a
>    certain rate? I tried stopping the egress queue by calling
>    netif_stop_queue(), but this only has the effect that the queue
>    overruns.
> 
> 
> I have the feeling that I'm missing out a very vital point on how the
> kernel's networking subsystem works. Unfortunately, Understanding Linux
> Network Internals couldn't help me out here.

I think this is what causes the behaviour:

1) If the network device is congested, packets will queue up in the qdisc

2) Socket memory gets used up, semdmsg will probably sleep here:
udp_sendmsg
ip_make_skb
__ip_append_data
sock_alloc_send_skb
sock_alloc_send_pskb
sock_wait_for_wmem

3) When packets are sent, the socket destructor will be called and wake up
the sender:
sock_wfree()
sk->sk_write_space(sk); (which is sock_def_write_space)


It would be interesting to see what will happen if the qdisc is smaller than
the socket memory...

	-Michi
-- 
programing a layer 3+4 network protocol for mesh networks
see http://michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-14  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-13 12:11 net_device: limit rate ot tx packets christian+kn at wwad.de
2013-04-14  6:15 ` michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com [this message]
2013-04-14  7:45   ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2013-04-14  8:09     ` michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com
2013-04-14 14:35       ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2013-04-17 14:30         ` christian+kn at wwad.de

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130414061520.GA2288@grml \
    --to=michi1@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).