kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: safarin87@gmail.com (Safarin)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Practical way to rename kernel-release on custom kernel
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 02:08:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140711180856.GA23170@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <294147fe.a1f0.147244eeffd.Coremail.shhuiw@163.com>

Hi Guys,

Thanks for the reply. I have tried all you guys suggested.
Like shhuiw said that KERNELRELEASE only affect uname output so I use
method to change the naming by change inside the top level makefile.

Eventhough, I have make a change the output still not like I want. I
still see long output for that naming

$VERSION.$PATCHLEVEL.$SUBLEVEL-$EXTRAVERSION--ARCH-00570-g110e430-dirty

which it come from git commit id.
$ git describe
v3.16-rc2-570-g110e430 
**(not sure why got dirty at the end of the line)

But I already figure it out how to disable that long naming. By disable
inside .config under "CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO"

Thanks again.

Regards,
Safarin

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:24:18PM +0800, shhuiw wrote:
> Tried but found change KERNELRELEASE can only affect uname output.
> If you want to make version change, should modify top-level Makefile:
> 
>   1 VERSION = 3
>   2 PATCHLEVEL = 13
>   3 SUBLEVEL = 5
>   4 EXTRAVERSION =
>   5 NAME = One Giant Leap for Frogkind
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Regards,
> shhuiw
> 
> 
> At 2014-07-11 08:47:07, "shhuiw" <shhuiw@163.com> wrote:
> 
> In Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt, you can see:
> 
> 
> ...
> 1365     VERSION, PATCHLEVEL, SUBLEVEL, EXTRAVERSION
> 1366
> 1367         These variables define the current kernel version.  A few arch
> 1368         Makefiles actually use these values directly; they should use
> 1369         $(KERNELRELEASE) instead.
> 1370
> 1371         $(VERSION), $(PATCHLEVEL), and $(SUBLEVEL) define the basic
> 1372         three-part version number, such as "2", "4", and "0".  These three
> 1373         values are always numeric.
> 1374
> 1375         $(EXTRAVERSION) defines an even tinier sublevel for pre-patches
> 1376         or additional patches.  It is usually some non-numeric string
> 1377         such as "-pre4", and is often blank.
> 1378
> 1379     KERNELRELEASE
> 1380
> 1381         $(KERNELRELEASE) is a single string such as "2.4.0-pre4", suitable
> 1382         for constructing installation directory names or showing in
> 1383         version strings.  Some arch Makefiles use it for this purpose.
> 1384
> 1385     ARCH
> 1386
> 1387         This variable defines the target architecture, such as "i386",
> 1388         "arm", or "sparc". Some kbuild Makefiles test $(ARCH) to
> 1389         determine which files to compile.
> 1390
> 1391         By default, the top Makefile sets $(ARCH) to be the same as the
> 1392         host system architecture.  For a cross build, a user may
> 1393         override the value of $(ARCH) on the command line:
> 1394
> 1395             make ARCH=m68k ..
> ...
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Regards,
> shhuiw
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 2014-07-10 11:28:39, "Safarin" <safarin87@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hi Guys,
> >
> >This question might be very easy for all of you. But seem this is
> >kernelnewbies mailing list. I need to ask this question.
> >
> >I in the middle of learning to build custom kernel and my question is
> >how to have custom name for kernel version.
> >
> >$ uname -r
> >
> >I can see custom kernel print message.
> >
> >>From what I read, we can change inside .config 
> >CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-ARCH"
> >will produce the kernel release naming something like this.
> >3.16.0-rc3-ARCH
> >
> >But somehow, when I try to install the modules
> >
> >$make modules_install 
> >
> >I can see makefile create folder inside the lib/modules with naming
> >3.16.0-rc3-ARCH-00570-g110e430
> >
> >110e430 is actually commit id and I check that naming is generated by 
> >#define UTS_RELEASE "3.16.0-rc3-ARCH-00570-g110e430" in the
> >"include/generated/utsrelease.h" header  which will
> >overwrite "include/config/kernel.release".
> >
> >Back to the question, what is the practical way to naming the kernel
> >release for custom kernel? with additional question for understanding
> >more from where that utsrelease came from?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Regards,
> >Safarin
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Kernelnewbies mailing list
> >Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> >http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-11 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-10 15:28 Practical way to rename kernel-release on custom kernel Safarin
2014-07-10 15:56 ` AYAN KUMAR HALDER
2014-07-11  0:47 ` shhuiw
2014-07-11  7:24   ` shhuiw
2014-07-11 18:08     ` Safarin [this message]
2014-07-11  3:03 ` Anil Shashikumar Belur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140711180856.GA23170@archlinux \
    --to=safarin87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).