From: mail@beyermatthias.de (Matthias Beyer)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Better testing when patching divers/staging/ - howto?
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:11:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140905201119.GG28079@fu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140905185445.GA24174@kroah.com>
On 05-09-2014 11:54:45, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > I do not have that much ressources to always build a full kernel for
> > only one patchset, so would it be okay to (locally) merge my patchsets
> > into a temporary branch and build a (allyesconfig) kernel out of all
> > my patchsets?
>
> Why? If you just change one file, 'make' will only rebuild that one
> file.
Well, there comes git into play: If I do a build for
each branch I have, this takes a huge amount of time for all
patchsets, as when checking out another patchset, files get changed.
At this very moment, I have 15 patchsets ready for submission and one
I'm working on. Doing
for ps in patchsets; do make -j 8; done
still takes a lot of time then. That's why I asked the question.
> Also do a faster make, with the -j option. Pass in 2x the number of CPU
> cores you have, so if you have 2 cores do:
> make -j4
>
> to get a _much_ faster build.
Of course, I'm already doing this.
>
> > In addition, I do not have the appropriate hardware to actually _run_
> > the code. I always state this in my patchset messages, of course!
>
> It would be great if you could find some hardware, I really want to just
> delete this driver as no one seems to have the hardware anymore.
> You can only clean up just so much stuff without having to start to
> change the logic in the code, and you need the hardware to test that.
This sounds like the work I'm doing is a waste of time? Shall I
continue with my patches?
If not, I will find another staging driver I can work on, so no
problem! :-)
>
> hope this helps,
Indeed it does. I did not expect to get an answer directly from you!
Thank you a lot!
--
Mit freundlichen Gr??en,
Kind regards,
Matthias Beyer
Proudly sent with mutt.
Happily signed with gnupg.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20140905/db0f8311/attachment.bin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 16:42 Better testing when patching divers/staging/ - howto? Matthias Beyer
2014-09-05 18:54 ` Greg KH
2014-09-05 19:09 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2014-09-05 20:02 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2014-09-05 20:11 ` Greg KH
2014-09-05 20:31 ` Mandeep Sandhu
2014-09-05 20:11 ` Matthias Beyer [this message]
2014-09-05 22:17 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140905201119.GG28079@fu \
--to=mail@beyermatthias.de \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).