* EPROBE_DEFER and how it is supposed to work
@ 2014-09-09 18:26 Rajat Jain
2014-09-10 3:08 ` Real Name
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rajat Jain @ 2014-09-09 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Hi,
I'm not a newbie, but I am trying to understand the semantics of deferred probing.
My question is generic, but for an example:
Let's say I have a platform driver "A" for a device "a", that requires device "b" (controlled by driver "B") to be operational first. Both A &B can be built as part of kernel, or as modules independently. As far as I could tell, there is no way to specify the ORDER in which the drivers' probe routines should be called. I took a look at modprobe / depmod, but it seems to be of relevance for modules only that are loaded from user space. My questions:
1) Is there a way to specify that "Kernel should call A's probe routine only after B's probe routine"?
2) How I currently do this: In A's probe routine, I currently check if the device "b" is available. If not, I return -EPROBE_DEFER. This mostly works ok. However, I'm curious about the case where the driver B is not built as part of the kernel but A is. After getting an _EPROB_DEFER from a B's probe routine, when will the kernel try again? And for how long would it keep on trying? I verified that if I load the driver B manually from user space, the A's probe routine does not get called (if it gets called now - it would have returned success!).
Thanks,
Rajat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* EPROBE_DEFER and how it is supposed to work
2014-09-09 18:26 EPROBE_DEFER and how it is supposed to work Rajat Jain
@ 2014-09-10 3:08 ` Real Name
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Real Name @ 2014-09-10 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:26:27PM +0000, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not a newbie, but I am trying to understand the semantics of deferred probing.
>
> My question is generic, but for an example:
>
> Let's say I have a platform driver "A" for a device "a", that requires device "b" (controlled by driver "B") to be operational first. Both A &B can be built as part of kernel, or as modules independently. As far as I could tell, there is no way to specify the ORDER in which the drivers' probe routines should be called. I took a look at modprobe / depmod, but it seems to be of relevance for modules only that are loaded from user space. My questions:
>
> 1) Is there a way to specify that "Kernel should call A's probe routine only after B's probe routine"?
You can ask module A to load the required module B.
For example, lib/textsearch.c:textsearch_prepare -> lookup_ts_algo
lookup_ts_algo will load ts_bm.ko/ts_fsm.ko/ts_kmp.ko as required.
>
> 2) How I currently do this: In A's probe routine, I currently check if the device "b" is available. If not, I return -EPROBE_DEFER. This mostly works ok. However, I'm curious about the case where the driver B is not built as part of the kernel but A is. After getting an _EPROB_DEFER from a B's probe routine, when will the kernel try again? And for how long would it keep on trying? I verified that if I load the driver B manually from user space, the A's probe routine does not get called (if it gets called now - it would have returned success!).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rajat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-10 3:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-09 18:26 EPROBE_DEFER and how it is supposed to work Rajat Jain
2014-09-10 3:08 ` Real Name
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).