From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: john@jjdev.com (John de la Garza)
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:54:00 -0500
Subject: ternary vs double exclamation
In-Reply-To: <170340.1419901208@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
References: <CALD9WKwTq+QRPdWsBo5TeZ9Q-9hDW8cXt2-m5-C3B+6f17Sr8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<170340.1419901208@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Message-ID: <20150103235359.GA3588@vega.jjdev.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 08:00:08PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> If you're *really* ambitious, converting stuff to use a boolean
> rather than an int where appropriate would be nice - we don't do that enough
> currently. But that will require actually reading and understanding the code.


It should not be assumed that true will always be 1 as defined in
include/linux/stddef.h, right?