From: vinc94@gmail.com (Vincenzo Scotti)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Kernel thread scheduling
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 00:19:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150320231955.GA5713@vinc94-desktop> (raw)
Hello,
I am actually studying kernel threads, and I have some doubts about them.
Let's take for example this snippet of code
static int thread_function(void *data)
{
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
schedule();
}
pr_err("Stopped");
return 0;
}
This way it works just fine, and waits until I call kthread_stop on it.
But if I comment out that schedule() call, it just hangs my system when I load
it (it is part of a module). I see that the loop-schedule-wakeup pattern is used
among all the others kernel threads. But I don't get why I need to call the
scheduler explicitly.
I know that the kernel is fully preemptible, and in my interpretation I thought
that it could stop every running thread, even in kernel space, using a
timer-based interrupt handler, to give cpu to other threads. Doesn't this
pattern resemble a voluntary preemption model?
Where am I wrong?
next reply other threads:[~2015-03-20 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-20 23:19 Vincenzo Scotti [this message]
2015-03-20 23:27 ` Kernel thread scheduling Jeff Haran
2015-03-21 6:33 ` Anand Moon
2015-03-22 23:14 ` Vincenzo Scotti
2015-03-22 23:30 ` nick
2015-03-23 0:05 ` Ruben Safir
2015-03-23 0:35 ` nick
2015-04-10 1:51 ` Ruben Safir
[not found] ` <55272EA8.7010908@gmail.com>
2015-04-10 2:12 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-10 2:52 ` nick
2015-04-10 3:37 ` Ruben Safir
[not found] ` <5527CB72.1000401@gmail.com>
2015-04-12 2:21 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-12 3:02 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-12 4:16 ` nick
2015-04-12 4:53 ` Ruben Safir
[not found] ` <A2417C6E7F04A0438F09C31B33A6BE8B01D9CE3BE7@B-EXH-MBX2.liunet.edu>
2015-04-12 5:06 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-13 3:21 ` nick
2015-04-17 13:10 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-17 13:14 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 14:56 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 15:07 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2015-04-16 15:11 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 15:12 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 15:51 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2015-04-16 15:10 ` Aruna Hewapathirane
2015-04-16 15:37 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 15:11 ` Mark P
2015-04-16 16:31 ` Jeff Haran
2015-04-16 17:08 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 17:34 ` Jeff Haran
2015-04-16 18:28 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 18:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2015-04-16 21:41 ` Jeff Haran
2015-04-17 7:45 ` Silvan Jegen
2015-04-17 8:50 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 23:05 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 18:32 ` John de la Garza
2015-04-16 18:38 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 18:42 ` Ruben Safir
2015-04-16 19:43 ` Silvan Jegen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150320231955.GA5713@vinc94-desktop \
--to=vinc94@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).