From: milton@krutt.org (Milton Krutt)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: percolating ERESTARTSYS beyond PCI subsystem
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:14:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150419171425.GA4443@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150418185825.GD30508@kroah.com>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 01:40:57PM +0200, Milton Krutt wrote:
> > Hi. The scenario is a PCI driver on a kernel 3.19.2:
> >
> > is it possible, in case pending_signal(current) is true, to return -ERESTARTSYS
> > to insmod process, in order to get it restart (as expectable)?
> >
> > After some attempts (with pending_signal(current) being true), it seems that -ERESTARTSYS
> > is caught by the "pci layer" that complains saying something like "probing failed ..
> > unexpectedly returns -512" and nothing is restarted as expected.
>
> What is the exact error message?
probe of 0000:01:0a:0 failed with error code -512
> insmod should never return ERESTARTSYS unless some driver is doing
> something really odd/broken. What driver are you trying to load that
> does this?
It's an experimental driver. For debugging purposes, it has a loop, inside which the
process is put asleep by the mean of a wait queue, and the desired behaviour is to manually
wake up the process by pressing CTRL^C at any iteration. It's something like:
while(cond){
prepare_to_wait(&queue_head, &queue_entry, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if(condition_to_sleep)
schedule();
if(signal_pending(current))
return -ERESTARTSYS; /* up to the user level */
finish_wait(&queue_head, &queue_entry);
}
In previous versions of this driver, there was no signal management inside the loop and the
resulting behaviour was that the loop slept at its first iteration, then it got woken up by CTRL^C,
and then it never got put asleep again. (Or, to be precise, it was automatically woken up as soon as
it was put asleep).
So it seems that for having it sleeping through every iteration, the pending signal has to be cleared
at any iteration. (It seems that the in-tree documentation does not mention any way of doing this apart
of the one used here).
Thanks to you,
Mk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-19 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-18 11:40 percolating ERESTARTSYS beyond PCI subsystem Milton Krutt
2015-04-18 18:58 ` Greg KH
2015-04-19 17:14 ` Milton Krutt [this message]
2015-04-19 19:30 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150419171425.GA4443@debian \
--to=milton@krutt.org \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).