kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Did PCI/IRQ allocation change significantly after 4.2 kernel?
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:52:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160330215259.GF12673@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459373080.2736.1.camel@kernel-dev>

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:24:40PM -0400, Rob Groner wrote:
> And, we have a winner!
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> rtd at kernel-dev:~/git/kernels/linux$ git bisect good
> 991de2e59090e55c65a7f59a049142e3c480f7bd is the first bad commit
> commit 991de2e59090e55c65a7f59a049142e3c480f7bd
> Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Wed Jun 10 16:54:59 2015 +0800
> 
>     PCI, x86: Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq()
>     
>     To support IOAPIC hotplug, we need to allocate PCI IRQ resources on
> demand
>     and free them when not used anymore.
>     
>     Implement pcibios_alloc_irq() and pcibios_free_irq() to dynamically
>     allocate and free PCI IRQs.
>     
>     Remove mp_should_keep_irq(), which is no longer used.
>     
>     [bhelgaas: changelog]
>     Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>     Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> :040000 040000 765e2d5232d53247ec260b34b51589c3bccb36ae
> f680234a27685e94b1a35ae2a7218f8eafa9071a M	arch
> :040000 040000 d55a682bcde72682e883365e88ad1df6186fd54d
> f82c470a04a6845fcf5e0aa934512c75628f798d M	drivers
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I'll sort out what all of that means tomorrow...

Great job, please email these developers, and the pci mailing list with
the information and they will help you out.

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-30 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-29 14:15 Did PCI/IRQ allocation change significantly after 4.2 kernel? Rob Groner
2016-03-29 14:42 ` Greg KH
2016-03-29 14:43   ` Greg KH
2016-03-29 15:27     ` Rob Groner
2016-03-29 15:43       ` Greg KH
2016-03-29 18:27         ` Rob Groner
2016-03-29 18:38           ` Greg KH
2016-03-29 19:11             ` Rob Groner
2016-03-29 19:18               ` Greg KH
2016-03-29 19:22                 ` Greg KH
2016-03-29 20:11                   ` Rob Groner
2016-03-30  0:57                     ` Greg KH
2016-03-30 15:51                       ` Rob Groner
2016-04-02 22:26                         ` Greg KH
2016-03-30 21:24                       ` Rob Groner
2016-03-30 21:52                         ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160330215259.GF12673@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).