From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: waltfeasel@gmail.com (Walt Feasel) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 12:10:28 -0500 Subject: [TEST PATCH] staging: speakup: speakup_acntpc.c Consider octal permissions In-Reply-To: <20161126110513.GC8388@kroah.com> References: <1479783780-24229-1-git-send-email-waltfeasel@gmail.com> <20161126110513.GC8388@kroah.com> Message-ID: <20161126171027.GC9754@localhost> To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:05:13PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:03:00PM -0500, Walt Feasel wrote: > > Make suggested checkpatch modifications for > > WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO' are not preferred. > > Consider using octal permissions '0644'. > > WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred. > > Consider using octal permissions '0444'. > > > > Signed-off-by: Walt Feasel > > --- > > I am new to making trivial patches and do not make some > > for a few type of warnings. > > This is one of them as I am not fully certain that it is > > as easy as this. > > The replacing of 'S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO' with '0644' seems > > simple enough. > > However the adding of '_RW' to '__ATTR' to make '__ATTR_RW' > > I saw in a reply to a patch and am not sure that it would > > be relevant in this case. > > I also made a previous patch adding spaces around '|' and > > want to know if just replacing 'S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO' with > > '0644' in one shot would be acceptable since my being new > > and not fixing just one type of warning per patch. > > Seems straight forward but I have spammed other peoples > > email and the mailing list enough with improper patches. > > > > drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c > > index 27f812e..51281be 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_acntpc.c > > @@ -56,28 +56,28 @@ static struct var_t vars[] = { > > /* These attributes will appear in /sys/accessibility/speakup/acntpc. */ > > > > static struct kobj_attribute caps_start_attribute = > > - __ATTR(caps_start, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, spk_var_show, spk_var_store); > > + __ATTR_RW(caps_start, 0644, spk_var_show, spk_var_store); > > This breaks the build :( > I would assume from adding _RW as is didnt seem to be needed but only a visual reference to the octal's permissions without doing the math. I will look deeper into where __ATTR is probally being called then. I'm not really worried with builds yet till I have a better understanging of the issue as I would expect all of them to fail at this point.