From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
Subject: question on patch submission
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:01:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170428130131.GA11647@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d1bw7l4u.fsf@michaelmera.com>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:49:05PM +0900, Michael Mera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of the eudyptula challenge I submitted a coding style patch on
> staging (that you can find here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/28/148)
>
> I had read beforehand the submission guidelines, but I still have some
> questions which I think are more appropriate posted here than as an
> answer to the patch thread:
>
> - the patch is clear with "checkpatch.pl --strict", but there are some
> tabs in the middle of the line. In my editor and apparently with
> checkpatch.pl those tabs are used for alignment (so spend less than 8
> characters) so that the total of the line in less than 80 characters.
> In the submitted patch however, due to the +- at the beginning of the
> line they appear larger and thus the line in more than 80 character.
>
> My question is: Should I consider the patch clean or interpret the
> guideline "tabs are 8 characters" strictly (and not tabs "at the
> beginning on the line" are 8 characters)?
tabs are always intrepted at 8 character "stops" for kernel development.
Look at other patches on the mailing list and in your editor, all should
be fine when you create it using git.
> - when I make modification to the patch message but not the diff lines,
> should I still increment the patch version, or rather maybe resend it
> with something like RESEND in the subject?
Yes, make it a new version, as the version is the combination of both.
Make it trivially easy for a maintainer to know which version to accept.
Marking it as "RESEND" implies that either patch submission could be
accepted, but marking it with a version is explicit as to which you
should use.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-28 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-28 12:49 question on patch submission Michael Mera
2017-04-28 13:01 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-04-28 14:52 ` Michael Mera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170428130131.GA11647@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).