* Reviews on linux-kernel
@ 2017-09-26 7:19 Christoph Böhmwalder
2017-09-26 7:43 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Böhmwalder @ 2017-09-26 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
Hi all,
Here's a question that the various "how to help" documents about the
linux-kernel mailing list couldn't help me answer:
Is anyone "allowed" to review patches on the mailing list? Is it
considered appropriate for any random person to review a change and
approve/disapprove of it (given, of course, they have an understanding
of what's going on in and around the patch), or is this right reserved
for subsystem maintainers and other "known" people?
Let's say I saw a trivial patch on the linux-wireless mailing list,
replacing a local function by a globally defined one (e.g. ARRAY_SIZE).
If I know and understand what the patch does, is it appropriate for me
to put an "Acked-by" or "Reviewed-by" under it, even if I'm technically
not a part of this community?
Thanks in advance for your answers!
--
Regards,
Christoph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20170926/428f26dc/attachment.bin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Reviews on linux-kernel
2017-09-26 7:19 Reviews on linux-kernel Christoph Böhmwalder
@ 2017-09-26 7:43 ` Greg KH
2017-09-26 7:58 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2017-09-26 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:19:15AM +0200, Christoph B?hmwalder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a question that the various "how to help" documents about the
> linux-kernel mailing list couldn't help me answer:
>
> Is anyone "allowed" to review patches on the mailing list?
Yes, please do so.
> Is it considered appropriate for any random person to review a change
> and approve/disapprove of it (given, of course, they have an
> understanding of what's going on in and around the patch), or is this
> right reserved for subsystem maintainers and other "known" people?
Anyone can do this.
> Let's say I saw a trivial patch on the linux-wireless mailing list,
> replacing a local function by a globally defined one (e.g. ARRAY_SIZE).
> If I know and understand what the patch does, is it appropriate for me
> to put an "Acked-by" or "Reviewed-by" under it, even if I'm technically
> not a part of this community?
There is no "technically" here, if you participate, you are part of the
community, don't think there is some sort of "gatekeeper" here at all.
Please, review away!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Reviews on linux-kernel
2017-09-26 7:43 ` Greg KH
@ 2017-09-26 7:58 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Böhmwalder @ 2017-09-26 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
That settles my question. Thank you for taking the time and replying so
very quickly Greg!
--
Regards,
Christoph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20170926/f2dd8fd9/attachment.bin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-26 7:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-26 7:19 Reviews on linux-kernel Christoph Böhmwalder
2017-09-26 7:43 ` Greg KH
2017-09-26 7:58 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).